Archive for September, 2008:
George W. Bush Vs. A Taco
Over the past century we’ve seen some of the greatest rivalries unfold before our eyes. Whether that be the Red Sox vs. Yankees, Celtics vs. Lakers,Pepsi vs. Coke or Apple vs. Microsoft. But we have yet to fully appreciate the greatest rivalry of all time: George W. Bush vs. a taco. But who would be the victor in the battle between the diplomat and the dinner?
Question 1: Which is more popular?
While considered a traditional Mexican dish, tacos are enjoyed by people in Australia, Canada, China, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States (just to name a few places).
According to the latest polls, only 27% of Americans approve of how Bush is running the country. So in other words, you ask four people what they think of him, three of them would tell you that they dislike him. Poor Georgey.
Score: Taco 1 George 0
Question 2: Which is more relateable?
A graduate of Yale University, George worked in his family’s oil businesses for a number of years. He was a co-owner of the Texas Rangers, and would work his way into becoming Governor of Texas in 1994. A mere six years later, he became President of the United States.
Tacos can contain practically any type of meat, and can be easily made at home.
Score: Taco 2 George 0
Question 3: Which is more logical?
It had been reported that during a Pentagon meeting in August of 2004, President Bush had been overheard saying “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful - and so are we, they never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people - and neither do we.”
The purpose of the taco’s shell is to prevent its contents from spilling out. Because of the shell, a taco can be eaten from your hand, without the aid of utensils.
Score: Taco 3 George 0
Question 4: Which is more safe?
In December of 2006, 70 diners from Taco Bell restaurants on the East Coast fell sick from E. coli poisoning,
Based on data from various sources, George W and his War On Terror has been either the direct or indirect cause of death for between 9,402 and 27,607 civilians, 887 Coalition soldiers and approximately 4,016 Afghan Police, Military and Private Military contractors. That makes George responsible for between 14,305 and 31,965 deaths.
Which makes you feel more comfortable? 70 sick people or 14,000+ casualties?
Score: Taco 4 George 0
Question 5: Which is more dangerous to the other?
In 2006, U.S. Congress had approved spending $2.7 billion for a fence to be built on the U.S./Mexico border. Its now being reported that it will cost an additional $400 million.
Four years earlier, President Bush spoke to reporters with a noticeably bruised face. Who was the culprit? A pretzel.
Bush is not fearful of the Mexican people coming over illegally. He is fearful of choking on Mexican delicacies such Gorditas, Burritos, Taquitos, and (yes you guessed it) tacos.
Tacos, however, do not fear Bush.
Score: Taco 5 George 0
Verdict: Winner by a unanimous score of 5 to 0 - the Taco.
Well, until anyone can provide a better argument: A Taco > George W. Sorry, fella.
—
Do you feel the verdict was unjust? Do you think that Bush is more popular than a taco? Do you think tacos fear George W? Please leave us a comment.
If you enjoyed the post, let others know about it. Share it with a loved-one (or a liked-one, I don’t care). You can also vote for us at Humor-Blogs.com. While your votes won’t help put an end to the War On Terror, each vote will guarantee a taco the freedoms it rightfully deserves .
If Toilets Could Talk
—
What would your toilet say about you? What would you toilet tell you about your family or friends? How good is your aim? Please leave a comment.
If you enjoyed this comic, feel free to Digg, Stumble or Reddit. Also, if you could pop by humor-blogs.com and vote for this post, I would appreciate the support.
PETA Putting Cows Out Of Work
The extremist vegan group, PETA (or People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), has once again asked corporate America to do something weird. They recently asked Ben & Jerry’s to replace cow’s milk with human breast milk in their ice cream. If Ben & Jerry’s decide to take up PETA on their proposal, what would this mean to everyone?
The Farmers
Obviously, if all of Corporate America follows this example, the dairy farmers will find themselves out of work. And in order to make ends meet, they will need to adapt to this new methodology. One possibility would be for farmers to replace their cattle with unwed teenage mothers who could use the extra cash to help support their young families. A more stable option might be by utilizing large religious families who tend to pop out a new kid every 9 months. The lack of birth-control and a continuous flow of breast milk could keep the farmers in a comfortable position for many years to come.
Ben & Jerry’s
If the ice-cream giant were to decide to opt to go the breast-milk route, what initiatives would they put in place?
Would they decide to use home-grown milk, or have their supply outsourced from a third-world country where they could garner a much cheaper price?
Perhaps Ben & Jerry’s could set up employee initiatives that help their female staff supplement their income with breast-milk-money. They could even setup initiatives for their female employees (and wives of male employees) to produce more children with additional initiatives put in place for the sale of their mommy-juices. More babies, mean more breast milk, which means more profit.
The only downside may be that these female employees will need to report to work once every few days in order to harvest product from their ample baby-feeders (for quality control purposes). Nothing more annoying then “Barry from Accounting” suckling on your nipples to ensure your inventory is still good.
The Rest Of Corporate America
If you thought Corporate America was quick to pick up on the “green and more environmental” bandwagon, the human-produced milk boom will be twice as huge. Of course, some marketing people will decide to rebrand some of their more popular products in an effort to catch the eyes of consumers. Yes, my friends, the “breast” is yet to come.
—
What companies or products could you see switching to breast milk? Do you prefer you breast milk from a carton or straight from the source? What kind of work will the unemployed cows find? Leave a comment.
For more funny, check out humor-blogs.com and humorbloggers.com. You won’t regret it.
Tags: anti peta, breast milk, breasts, funny, funny photo, funny photos, funny picture, funny pictures, girls, humor, humour, PERF, peta, peta ads, peta sucks, photos, photoshop, satire, semi-nude, spoof
Celebrity Cleavage Challenge: The Name Game
For those who have been anticipating the latest edition to our Celebrity Cleavage Challenge series, you are in luck. This is the fourth edition of the series, and is named The Name Game. This means three more groups of famous chick’s chumbawumbas to try and identify.
Enjoy and good luck.
–
Were you able to correctly identify all three groups of glandular-endowments? Were your stumped by all three couples of cream-jugs? Do you want to see more milk factories? Are you impressed with the number of words to describe breasts? Please leave a comment.
If you enjoyed playing the game or have been enjoying the series, add this post to a social-bookmarking site, so others may find us. Also, go over to humor-blogs.com and vote for this post. While your vote won’t help finance development of this series, each vote lets someone else know you like looking at famous women’s wobbly-bits.
Mixing Metaphors
—
Have you ever mixed up your metaphors? Have you gotten in trouble for saying the wrong thing at the wrong time? Would you buy milk if you had a cow at home? Please leave a comment.
If you enjoyed the comic, feel free to Digg, Stumble or e-mail it to a friend. Also, if you could stop by humor-blogs.com and vote for this post, that would be great.
